Skip to main content

I would If I could 19: Limiting unlimited acquisition of limited resources

 Solution: Limit the number of real estate or house or apartments or residence a person can own. Anything other than 1 should be discouraged with penalty or exponential recurring increasing tax.

Similar model should be worked towards all resources which are limited. Real estate or land is always limited and cannot be increased without ecological destruction. Very few are owning multiple or bigger quantity of residential area or properties, renting them or flipping them and making this as a business. Business is good but few owning limited resources like water (recyclable) or air and renting it to others is outrageous then one should know that real estate is even limited than air or water.

Advantages: 

  1. Many will be now able to own a house than rent
  2. More buy and sell of properties when people move to different places for work, opportunities. If I am moving from city A to city B for better opportunities then it is in my self interest that I sell my house in city A and buy one at city B.
  3. Real estate prices will be more reachable and very less pressure on government for the same
  4. When more people buy instead of renting a house, they spend more on the house, they would add furniture, electronics, decorative items, paint, remodeling etc., since they own it. If someone owns a house in a area then they are most likely concerned about the well being of the area and thus participate in elections. If I am only renting, then I can always keep shifting whenever I want.
  5. Those who want to own more houses will now have to buy it in the name of their family members, The number of parents or a partner (husband or wife) is a fixed number but number of children is the only variable number in a family, this will encourage richer people to have more children which will eventually lead to wealth redistribution. When richer people start to have more children than poor the economic disparity between citizens of a society will keep going down for every new generation.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Reservations and Appeasement: A conspiracy to destroy India

The best way to destroy a country is to make it destroy itself by its own people who feel righteous about themselves when they do it. The western countries like USA and other European countries need talent to drive their countries, corporations forward so that they stay ahead of the curve and this can be achieved only real talent. When in countries like india bring forth laws which will make sure that the important key positions in the government sector are based on discrimination, color, caste, language, creed and origin the real talented youngsters will obviously turn to the private sectors and a lot of these youngsters and talented youth is being grabbed at a high price from many western institutions and corporations like NASA, Google, Microsoft etc., which will only benefit the west and its interests because now we have indians working for western companies and countries in competition with india. It is in the interest of these western countries and private corporati...
Read more

I would If I could - 2 - Viral development via Smart Cities

Viral development via Smart Cities example city : bangalore Current disadvantages of cities/smart cities polarization of growth, development Dis connectivity between the residents of city and the rest of the citizens of the country Rise of class system migration of people, talent only towards city causing weaker section of society everywhere except city. talented, efficient people would not want to go to other places than cities due to lack of facilities, growth or development there won't be any growth, development or facilities other than cities due to lack of efficient people in places other than cities and also lack of interest sooner are later cities become seeders and places away from cities become leechers (if you have used bittorrent technology, then you would know) The migration of people to cities will always be higher than the rate of growth or accommodation and capacity of the cities due to the natural tendency of people to migrate to a better place with ...
Read more

stackexchange: Are shudras and women not allowed to chant Aum i.e Pranava?

since stackexchange is becoming like reddit and wikipedia where unknown , behind the mask moderators run these sites like dictatorship, I have decided to add answers here. Chanting and reading are different. Vedic Chanting has two parts - Tone and Recitation (Patha). It further has four different tones - Udatta, Anudaatta, Svarita and Deergha Svarita. Pathas are the styles of hymnal recitation. So unless your are are well skilled in these and your pronouncination, enunciation is accurate, you are not supposed to chant. Chanting the same mantras in different way produces different effects, different vibrations. Many a times a slight difference in spacing, intonation, pronounciation, enunciation produces different meanings. So unless you are classically trained to chant these, one shall avoid it but can read them with sound without making a sound, silently. Ex: Many in north india swap va & ba. Ravindranath tagore becomes rabindranath tagore. Many in north india also swap ra & da...
Read more