How to make crony Corpo Game

How does a real crony corpo game looks like and what all does it have? Let us talk about it. This is a small gist from my 20+ years of gaming. I am taking an example of an online multiplayer game as an example since this should cover the most scenarios.

1. Keep it closed
   The game should be closed source and preferably should have a launcher of its own to spy on users about their spending (time and money) habits related games or anything in general. 
2. Both the game and launcher should have an update mechanism where the corpos can push a custom update to few people, groups, individuals. 
3. Collude with government, surveillance bodies through 3rd, 4th party investors where if and when needed, using step 2, you can push a custom update to spy, sabotage or do anything else. 
4. Have a boost hierarchy based on race, color, gender, geography, religion, region etc., Make a list of characters and each of these traits will have a +1 or -1 point. Higher points a person has (spending, gender, region, religion etc.,) he gets boosted, The more negative points they have, they get nerfed or crippled. ex: All top video game players, all top video game streamers, all top earning video gamers are all of a certain region, gender, race, color even though they are less than 10% of the world population. 
   Lets call the players in the boost list as E(lite) players, players to be N(erfed)players.
5.  Extreme burden of proof for the victim. You have to ensure that the nplayers have an extreme burden of proof to prove that they are being nerfed. you can do this with extreme scrutinisation of their game play. ex:- If an nplayer throws a grenade, you do 10 checks per damage point, perform all possible checks but for an eplayer perform minimal checks. So, nplayers will have more animation tax, network tax which all might result in lag.
6. Dynamic difficulty. The difficulty should vary based on how much of a player is an nplayer or an eplayer. The availability of items to play the game should be such that the nplayers face more difficulty and eplayers have it easy. Check the list of items with which a player has the most success in his gameplay. If it is an eplayer then chances of him getting his items with high success rate should be higher. It should be reverse for the nplayer. Ex: nplayer has least chances of getting his favorite guns than his favorite guns. eplayer has higher chances of getting his desired guns early than not so desired guns.
7. Have many such dark patterns as possible. Whenever a user spends some money within the game, then give him a temporary boost, this is to ensure that he spends often not just once or twice or just a few times a year. The boost should be such that it should make them spend more & more. 
8. Non spenders should be used as a cannon fodder. They are getting your game for free, they are consuming your resources for free, what else do they want? They should be thankful that they are getting it for free. When it is free, then it is the consumer who is the product and they will be fed to spending player aka eplayers to stroke their ego.
9. Have many bots of your own to control gameplay. Feed these bots as cannon fodder to eplayers and feed nplayers as cannon fodder to bots, this should ensure that eplayers, spenders are on top and others are at the bottom.  
10. The most valuable thing in anyone's life is time. Government should invest in games to consume the time, energy the youth of the opponent nations because in this modern world of economics, every productive citizen of your opponent country is a solider and it is only fair in a war to weaken the enemy's soldier, it is the most humane thing to do that killing a solider in a physical conflict.

The Strategy Behind Illegal Immigration

Illegal immigration could be expunged with a single action. The Middle East has no such problem, yet the West does. One could stop illegal immigration simply by punishing the businesses that hire undocumented workers, rather than the victims the immigrants themselves who are exploited. What if this wasn't a failure of policy, but a strategy? Here is how it serves the "predators" at the top of the food chain: elites, governments, oligarchs, and capitalists alike.

Someone to Blame

Governments can now blame immigrants both legal and illegal for the mismanagement of the economy, the corruption they oversee, and the endless upward movement of wealth. All of these systemic issues are pinned on illegal immigrants.

A Tool for Racial Supremacy

Have you ever seen a religious supremacist compare the best of their side with the worst of the other? A racist often compares their "best-looking" person with the "worst-looking" person from another group. A meat-eater might compare the best of their kind with the worst examples of vegans or vegetarians.

Imagine a white supremacist who wants to affirm their supremacy to other whites who are mostly liberal or open-minded. They might do this by importing the most problematic individuals from non-white groups and placing them strategically in liberal or centrist areas. To avoid being caught in this deduction, they do the opposite: they stand as supporters of immigration and label the deportation of even illegal immigrants as "racist."

For example, the UK imported masses of people from other countries sometimes individuals whom even their own countrymen avoided. These immigrants then acted as "transplants," slowly turning some areas into ghettos and transforming them into the likeness of the villages or towns they fled. Many educated individuals from the same regions such as Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Iran, or Iraq would not want to associate with them.

While countries like Nigeria are famous for their doctors, the system often imports scammers to Europe instead. In the name of pity or "fake liberalism," they are given a free hand and a level of legal insulation so they can continue to disturb the peace, thereby convincing the rest of the population that "others" are savage.

If Europe, the USA, Canada, or Australia imported only "top-shelf" immigrants doctors and engineers it would have the opposite effect. In every country where Indians have gone, for instance, they are statistically at the bottom of the list for crime, divorce, welfare, and homelessness. Conversely, they are at the top for income per ethnicity, graduation rates, and professional roles (engineers, doctors, lawyers). This creates a "threat" where the immigrant is seen as better than the native. While no one is inherently better or worse by genes, the value system and culture make them who they are.

Helping Businesses

Businesses gain access to cheap labor. They get to exploit workers by paying them half the standard wage for twice the work. They provide substandard living and safety conditions because these immigrants cannot go to the authorities to complain. Furthermore, these businesses can collaborate with immigration departments by occasionally reporting their own staff, which helps the department meet its quotas.

If there were no illegal immigrants, many in the immigration department would lose their employment and funding. If there were no crime, what would happen to the "judicial-capitalistic complex" (judiciary, prisons, and police)? If there were no diseases, what would happen to pharmaceutical companies?

Supply for the Predators

Predators can prey on illegal immigrants and exploit them, knowing their victims are too afraid to go to the authorities. Whether for illegal labor, organ trafficking, or even darker fetishes, illegal immigrants provide an easy supply for the needs of these predators.

Good for Politicians

Immigration provides a perfect issue for getting elected. A politician can rise to power promising to deport immigrants, then do the opposite or nothing at all; making more noise than results. Most politicians are not worried about the long-term future; they are worried about the future of their own offspring. If the economy is failing, they can blame unemployment, inflation, healthcare expenses, and crime on immigrants.

---

Conclusion

It is idiocy to expect someone to commit suicide for someone else’s benefit. When the existence of pharmaceutical companies depends on the existence of ailments and physical suffering, is it not idiocy to expect them to work against their own existence by producing total cures? Similarly, is it not idiocy to expect politicians to solve our problems when their existence depends on the existence of those very problems? Are you an idiot?