Skip to main content

Is unity possible with division?

I often see, hear and learn about people trying to end
borders,
racism,
prejudice,
sexism etc., but I have realized that their goal or vision is too small. The biggest so far I have seen is end of racism. Why do I see it as the biggest? because some assume that addressing a race is the biggest denominator and you can address most number of people. This however leads to segregation and those who produce within themselves degenerate genetically, culturally and in so many other ways. I see religion as the biggest, safest and the right way of unifying people.We already know that fights over religion have cost a lot of lives and historically it might be the 2nd biggest killer after lust for power. So how can we unit people based on religion and still not cause problem?.
Most might think that I am talking about hindus vs muslims vs jews, christians vs budhist etc., which is a big no. We want to unite people who aren't most likely get along and also at the same time give them a pressing reason to.
I suggest abrahamics vs non abrahamics. Today almost all religions can be categorized as abrahamics (jews, muslim, christians, amish etc.,) and non abrahamics (hindus, budhist, sikh, jain, etc.,). It doesnt have to be a way but it can be a cold war where each is competing respectfully for the betterment of the society. This is why I think that in order for us to end racism, borders (may be in near future) and other dividing factors which divide people into multiple small pieces, we can unite all in just 2 groups, 2 pieces which is better than everyone trying to overtake others violently. It is a thought. Just making a note of it here.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Reservations and Appeasement: A conspiracy to destroy India

The best way to destroy a country is to make it destroy itself by its own people who feel righteous about themselves when they do it. The western countries like USA and other European countries need talent to drive their countries, corporations forward so that they stay ahead of the curve and this can be achieved only real talent. When in countries like india bring forth laws which will make sure that the important key positions in the government sector are based on discrimination, color, caste, language, creed and origin the real talented youngsters will obviously turn to the private sectors and a lot of these youngsters and talented youth is being grabbed at a high price from many western institutions and corporations like NASA, Google, Microsoft etc., which will only benefit the west and its interests because now we have indians working for western companies and countries in competition with india. It is in the interest of these western countries and private corporati...
Read more

I would If I could - 2 - Viral development via Smart Cities

Viral development via Smart Cities example city : bangalore Current disadvantages of cities/smart cities polarization of growth, development Dis connectivity between the residents of city and the rest of the citizens of the country Rise of class system migration of people, talent only towards city causing weaker section of society everywhere except city. talented, efficient people would not want to go to other places than cities due to lack of facilities, growth or development there won't be any growth, development or facilities other than cities due to lack of efficient people in places other than cities and also lack of interest sooner are later cities become seeders and places away from cities become leechers (if you have used bittorrent technology, then you would know) The migration of people to cities will always be higher than the rate of growth or accommodation and capacity of the cities due to the natural tendency of people to migrate to a better place with ...
Read more

stackexchange: Are shudras and women not allowed to chant Aum i.e Pranava?

since stackexchange is becoming like reddit and wikipedia where unknown , behind the mask moderators run these sites like dictatorship, I have decided to add answers here. Chanting and reading are different. Vedic Chanting has two parts - Tone and Recitation (Patha). It further has four different tones - Udatta, Anudaatta, Svarita and Deergha Svarita. Pathas are the styles of hymnal recitation. So unless your are are well skilled in these and your pronouncination, enunciation is accurate, you are not supposed to chant. Chanting the same mantras in different way produces different effects, different vibrations. Many a times a slight difference in spacing, intonation, pronounciation, enunciation produces different meanings. So unless you are classically trained to chant these, one shall avoid it but can read them with sound without making a sound, silently. Ex: Many in north india swap va & ba. Ravindranath tagore becomes rabindranath tagore. Many in north india also swap ra & da...
Read more