Corrective or vengeful reciprocation

 Over years, I have become convinced about "corrective reciprocation" being the safest moral principle that an individual or a group can employ. Reciprocation is a principle where you treat others the way they treat you. So, you expect to be treated the way you treat them. You will do unto them what they did to you. There is a flaw in the principle of reciprocation. Let us say there is an encroacher. He kept on encroaching your territory from ages and you start reciprocating, once he realises it, the encroacher stops encroaching and wants to come to a treaty with you to stop mutual destruction. If you agree, then it is your loss because you have already lost a lot of territory to him since he has started exploiting a lot earlier than you started encroaching him. Let us say china & pakistan are encroaching indian territory. They have been doing it from a long time, then india starts reacting and starts claiming it back and then they come to the table and in the name of peace want all of us to stop encroaching on each others territory but if india agrees then india got fooled because after few years, they will do it again because if they encroach 20km and you start reciprocating and claim back 10km, they come to peace talks and all agree to stop encroachment, then they still gained 10km from you. 2 steps forward, 1 step back == 1 step forward. This is the weakness of recriprocation. Corrective reciprocation is something where you keep reciprocating untill 1 of 2 things happen. 1) reciprocation for a time period == the time duration of opponents act 2) untill you get back what you lost. 2nd one is more sensible and accurate since it is result & impact based. However to be on a safer side, I suggest vengeful reciprocation where you reciprocate the opponent's behaviour against him untill you not only gain what you lost but you get back with interest. If they took 10, you take your 10 back and a bit more, usually at least 10%. I choose 3.

1. Reciprocation 
2. Corrective reciprocation 
3. vengeful reciprocation 

Define their values, threaten it and make them give up what you want

Let us take the example of Hindus. The values of Hindus were defined by their scriptures. The most important principle for them was Dharma, whereas for the desert religions—Islam and Judaism—it was peace, and for Christianity, it was prosperity and salvation. This distinction is also reflected in their greetings. Muslims and Jews wish for peace when they meet and greet, whereas such a concept was never central to Hindu values. Dharma dictates doing the right thing, choosing the right path—not necessarily the easiest or most beneficial choice, as they are not always the same.

Instead of upholding Dharma, the Hindu value system was replaced with new ideals—peace and global reputation—as the highest goals. For the sake of peace, Hindus were made to divide their country into three parts, giving two to Islam. Hindus did not even get one out of the three countries exclusively; instead, India was made a secular nation. "Pakistan and Bangladesh are ours, but India is for everyone," declared the Muslims—and Hindus were forced to accept it in the name of peace. Two private accounts for Islam, one joint account for Hindus. 

Today, the land reserved for Muslims in India (Waqf properties) is larger than the size of Pakistan—and this was facilitated by Hindu leaders who pretended to be Hindu in speech, attire, and name but worked against Hindu interests. In the name of peace and brotherhood, Hindus are now expected to accept fewer rights than others.

• Hindus cannot own or manage their temples.
• They cannot independently run their schools.
• Their temple donations are taken by the government, which then funds non-Hindu religious institutions.

Since Hindus abandoned Dharma, they were fooled into accepting peace as their highest ideal. Now, their reputation as the "good boys" of the world matters more than righteousness, reciprocity, and choosing the right path—not the easiest or most convenient one. It is all heading towards -->"What is yours is ours, what is ours is mine, what is mine is mine.

"When I am weak, I ask for freedom because it is your principle; when I am strong, I take away your freedom because it is my principle" - Frank Herbert

Our principle was dharma, reciprocity not anything else, but they changed our principle to chasing brotherhood, chasing peace and give up anything when these are threatened.

Fooling the world with narrative

 Majority of the world goes by their senses. Which are

• what they hear about you,
• what they see about you 
• and your speech.

Let us use a reality based fiction. Let us say you want an anti hindu in power in india. How would you do that when the majority of the voter base in india is hindus? Easy.

Create hatred, fear against non hindus in india by encouraging violence on hindus by non hindus making them face the least or no possible repurcussions or consequences for rioting or violent attacks on hindus. Do the opposite for hindus. If hindus act, react or defend or riot or even counter the act of violence by their opponents and they are succeeding then suppress, oppress them, jail them, even shoot them as seen during gujarat revolt. Then also make sure they are entangled forever in court cases, bury them in court cases and bureacratic hell. If it is non hindus, then offer them an easy way out, support them legally, financially. It is also important to note what you say, what is said about you. While these incidents happen in pockets, the influencers of all kind should be projecting you as pro hindu, hindu extremist, hindu terrorist, anti non hindu maniac etc., What does this do? This creates sympathy for you and gives you a cover. Instead of hindus hating you, they will now sympathise with you, they will support you, they will convince themselves that your inaction towards them, not lending a helping hand is because of villains in the media, press. It is important that these influencers in all media keep projecting as an extremist of the biggest votebank in the country, while your actions, impacts of your actions can exactly be the opposite. You can keep strengthening your non hindu groups, keep weakening hindus and hindu groups, eliminate all hindu leadership competition by any means. Create a sense of 'if it is not you, then who' after pushing such a narrative for some days, even though a country has more than 140crore people, if done right, the people will be fooled to believe that the person you are projecting as the irreplaceable is truly better than 140 crore population and there can be no one better than him amongst 140 crore people. It does not matter your man is uneducated, has no family, can't speak or has no mannerisms, marketing matters a lot when people are naive. as OSHO said "democracy is by the people, from the people, for the people, but people are retarded". The top 10% are always 90% better than the rest of the 90% in a chosen field of expertiese". top 10% of developers are better than the rest 90% by 90% margin in development. If we sort people based on smartness, then the top 10% are always at least 90% smarter than the rest 90%. So when you are in power, you can hire such cons, smart people who are experts in influencing, brain washing, fooling people and pushing narratives. While the majority population of the country, hindus, keep voting, supporting, funding you, you can continue to act against their interests. Every often you need to keep reminding these foolish population on why they are supporting you, you can do that by frequenctly scaring them of non hindus, you can even play scripted violent incidents against hindus by colluding with non hindus which will instill fear and hatred in hindus against non hindus and provoke them to vote you. 

counter

If even 10% of the remaining hindus start promoting their government, system, judiciary, everything and everyone else as anti hindu, consistantly then irrespective of whether they are anti hindu are not, they will start becoming pro hindu. It is important to acknowledge any positive impactful actions taken by them but not to praise them for it but always keep criticising their shortcomings in not being anti hindu, keep pointing all that is anti hindu about them, nobody has to do it in a scale bigger than the others, louder than the others but consistancy and persistence are the key. Always target global narrative, not just local. Just like how every conflict of whites is a global conflict who are hardly 7% of the population but all catastrophic non white conflicts even resulting in catastrophic deaths are termed local or hardly get any mentioning. Same way, just like you eat 2, 3 times a day, sleep once a day, add this to your chore of pointing out anti hinduness once a day, everyday even after you die.

Sovil Engineering: Control their options

The power of influence is something beyond measure in modern society. You do not have to be the most capable person or a giant in any field, as long as you can influence them, you are in control, you are ruling, you reap the benefits but without any drawbacks or backlash. You can make someone or many of them or a group or a population to choose what you want them to choose. It is in human nature to choose what is best, instead of choosing what is right. If you control all the options, then you can make them choose the one you want by making it the least worst which is often the best. Why do you think people keep choosing the corrupt and corrupt parties to power, inspite of them having a proven record of beign corrupt and incompetant? becasue all the options given to you are controlled. If they need the option A to be chosen, then they will ensure that they will give you all the other options which are way worse than that. So the only way to win the game is not playing it?

Let us take a hypothetical, fictious event. Let us say you want to install a leader in india. The biggest votebank in india is hindus. Voting in india is still based on religion, language, culture etc., Then ensure all the genuine options for the hindus which are not anti hindu in action and impact are out of the race. Either eliminate their career with smear campaign, honey trap or entrapment of corruption or eliminate their physical existence. Then in the remaining options, let your option be the least worst. Then people will keep voting and choosing your option. 

• Create hatred against non hindus by creating an incident where a large group of hindu pilgrims die at the hands of a group called M
• Use media, national, local and international influence power of print, digital media to project your choice as an anti M, pro hindu, hindu extremist who massacred Ms even though your man killed more hindus, shot more hindus who were revolting against the killing of innocent hindu pilgrims to protect the culprit group M. It doesnt matter what the truth is as long as you shout the longest, loudest and almost all of the voices others hear are yours.
• This creates a sympathy for your man and hindus will vote your choice to power
• Use your muscle power, media power to eliminate the uncontrollable opponents & better opponents. 
• Every now and then use scripted incidents to instill hate & fear in hindus against Ms and provoke hindus into voting your choice, your group in the hopes of revenge, protection and security.

Create and control problems which encourages people to choose your choice. People usually create solutions for the problems. Here you are creating problems, scripted problems which you control to force people to choose your solutions.

Make racism, monoculturalism relevant again.

goal: Make whites superior again.

example 1: You can make whites superior by making portraying their contribution, their deeds as exemplary, revolutionary, progressive, paint how even their acts of colonization, occupation helped the victims and improved them. In parellel, it is necessary to also keep cultivating a public scripted, controlled setup to portray the non whites as less than human. let us take the examples of blacks. Blacks in america are encouraged to commit crime, crime against each other, be anti social by carefully implementing the following. Create a worst example of them, then compare that worst example of them with the best of yours. Dont tell people what to think, just push their thoughts in your direction. 

• Encourage brown on brown crime
• via Influencing art, pop culture like music, movies etc.,
• Discourage policing in those areas to encourage the thriving of crime in their areas, do it in the name of preventing racially motivated overpolicing 
• minimal punishment for brown on brown crime
• minimal punishment for white on brown crime
• maximum punishment for brown on white crime
• fair punishment for white on white crime
• Mushrooming of gun shops, gambling shops, unhealthy food stalls, liquor shops in those areas. 
• Take away their will to progress, hunger for progress, upliftment, empowerment by making them lazy, by socializing their basic needs.
• Encourage dismemberment of family system by financially, socially incentivizing acts which are anti family, one example is fatherless homes, multiple children from multiple men out of wedlock where you receive certain incentives per such child.
• Make the livelihood of a lot of social justice activists depend on the existence of such problems, so it is in their best interest to keep the problems alive and well, otherwise they will be out of business. Just like how if pharmaceuticals cure the disease, then they will be out of business. Politicians will be out of their business if they solve the problems of the people.

Using their own tactics against them is a well-established strategy employed throughout history. Currently, Hindus are being actively divided and turned against each other, often by the state itself. This is achieved by exacerbating caste divisions, fostering jealousy, and instigating competition for quotas and reservations based on caste. Historically, Shudras, a significant part of Hinduism, were compelled to compete in a 'victimhood Olympics,' receiving special privileges and the power to accuse other Hindus, leading to their imprisonment based on mere accusations. This was facilitated by the SC/ST Act, under which a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe could accuse a person from another caste of verbal abuse or caste-based insults, a non-bailable offense. Furthermore, the alleged victim would receive monthly compensation, effectively incentivizing false accusations against fellow Hindus.

Then you don't need to tell the world that white people are better than the rest of the rest are inferior than the whites. You just now showed people to what to think. Most people are at least this intelligent. This is been tried everywhere. In canada, it is with the sikhs. They let in the people that the origin country itself doesnt want, let them lose in their own ghettos in canada, let them commit crimes against the citizens of all kind. Then the masses will automatically come to the conclusion that multi culturalism is bad, seggregation of races with borders called nations, race based nations is good & better for all. They could let the best kind of all races into their nation and they will create a better example of a race than the natives in every paramter but that won't serve the agenda.

OR

may be they dont want to take the best brains out of the developing countries and devoid of their greatest resource for growth, human resources. It is all in the perception.

Sovil engineering: Disarming the opponents - 786

Disarming Your Enemies: The Art of Making Weakness Appealing

When you disarm your opponents or weaken them, it is especially beneficial—and easy—to make them feel great about it. Make them hate what makes them strong, and make them love, appreciate, and embrace what makes them weak.

You might have noticed that psychopaths, when exploiting others, frame it as being in the victim’s best interest—how they’ll be "better off" with this new "deal." If you’re selling something harmful, a psychopath won’t just convince you it’s safe; they’ll make you believe your situation will improve.

Similarly, when disarming a society, feeding them a poison pill, or making them adopt weakness, you don’t just take away their power—you rebrand that power as a weakness and make them feel proud for relinquishing it.

The Greatest Defense Mechanism of Hindus: The Jaati System

Hindu jaatis (castes) are extremely diverse. Abrahamic conversion formulas failed because a single approach couldn’t work against all jaatis. A medicine works against a virus, but imagine a virus family where each strain requires a different cure. These viruses, upon multiplying, mutate into new strains faster than new medicines can be developed.

The Three Primary Powers (Deities) in Hinduism

1. Wisdom/Intelligence/Education – Saraswati (6/A)
2. Wealth/Prosperity – Laxmi (8/U)
3. War/Health – Shakti (Durga) (7/M)

These three goddesses are the primary female deities in Hinduism. Their male counterparts are:

• BrahmA (Generator)
• VishnU (Operator)
• Maheshwar/Mahadev (Destroyer)

Together, they form AUM (ॐ), representing the cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction.

The female deities are the source of power for the male trinity. Every human, especially men, is naturally driven to pursue these three forces—to attract them, align with them, and earn their favor.

How Hindus Were Disarmed

1. Giving Up Shakti (War/Health)

Hindus were systematically disarmed—made to abandon weapons, martial spirit, and warrior ethos—all in the name of "peace." Those preaching peace often glorified non-violence while enforcing it through violence. The result? The preachers gained power, while the victims lost both peace and strength.

British puppets like Gandhi were brought to India to persuade millions not to revolt. The British even promoted Gandhi as their "biggest opponent," fooling Indians into following him. The British were less than 1% of India’s population; even a small uprising could have driven them out. But by convincing Hindus to abandon Shakti (violence/self-defense), they prolonged colonial rule.

Gandhi preached non-violence for India’s freedom but urged Indians to join the British Army to kill Britain’s enemies. He struck a deal: if Indians fought for Britain, they might gain freedom. But when it came to resisting the British, he demanded passivity.

Similarly, figures like Ghanshyam Pandey (later rebranded as Swami Narayan) were propped up by the British to dilute Hinduism. His cult, BAPS, mimics Hinduism but rejects its scriptures, pushing monotheism—a stepping stone to Abrahamic conversion.

Gandhi never asked non-Hindus to disarm. He told Hindu women to endure rape and Hindu men to offer their necks to swords—all for "peace." When Muslims launched Direct Action Day to partition India, Hindus were defenseless.

2. Surrendering Laxmi (Wealth/Prosperity)

Today, influencers promote Hindu leaders who preach against wealth. Yet, wealth builds temples, funds political movements, and controls media. Hindu temple donations are seized by the government and spent on anti-Hindu agendas.

The wealthy preach against wealth because they fear competition. If 90% of society pursued riches, the elite’s monopoly would crumble.

Money can buy wisdom and power—it hires muscle and brains. Unlike forced allegiance, wealth secures loyalty willingly.

3. Abandoning Saraswati (Wisdom/Education)

Without knowledge, you remain enslaved. Hindu scriptures—Ramayana, Mahabharata—taught strategy, enemy recognition, and reciprocity. Had Hindus not been tricked into abandoning these texts, they would never have followed Gandhi or disarmed themselves.

False superstitions spread:

• "Keeping Mahabharata at home causes family strife."
• "Ramayana brings separation between husband and wife."

These lies severed Hindus from their intellectual roots.

The Uniqueness of Each Power

• Shakti (War): Forces the other two powers to serve you—but forced allegiance is temporary.
• Laxmi (Wealth): Voluntarily recruits wisdom and strength. Money buys loyalty more reliably.
• Saraswati (Wisdom): Uses logic to persuade the other two powers.

Work is Worship

Worship isn’t just ritual—it’s action. Anyone who is pursuing knowledge, wisdom, intelligence, education is a worshipper of saraswati. It does not matter the pursuer knows her existence or he is an atheist. As the laws of karma dictate, one by default is destined to get the fruits of the labor almost all the time.

• Pursuing knowledge = Worship of Saraswati
• Acquiring wealth = Worship of Laxmi
• Strengthening defense = Worship of Shakti

Non-Hindus excel in these areas without "worshiping" these deities. The key is action, not empty rituals.

When Europeans (or whites) went to Africa, India, or America, they encountered societies that welcomed outsiders and celebrated guests but did not prioritize material wealth or warfare. The existence of smaller kingdoms in India, for instance, suggested that most rulers were not focused on conquering their neighbors. It was an era of peace and prosperity—but peace breeds weakness, weakness breeds violence, violence breeds strength, and strength in turn restores peace. Thus, the cycle continues.

This excessive hospitality—treating guests better than one’s own—is a symptom of weakness, a lack of Shakti (power/war/violence) in society. Even if it were slightly stronger (say, 0.87 instead of 0.6), the outcome would remain the same: eventual collapse, though perhaps delayed. The damage would be severe, and recovery could take ages—if it happens at all.

Even today, in India—the last refuge for Hindus—Hindus have fewer rights than those of foreign faiths. Guests receive more privileges and special treatment than our own people. This is a sign of abandoning, rejecting, and insulting Shakti—the essence of warfare, vigilance, and Shatrubodh (the understanding of the enemy). Hindus were cunningly deceived into disarming themselves, surrendering their Shakti, their prime deity, through the influence of peace fanatics like Gandhi.

Furthermore, Hindus were manipulated into relinquishing wealth by non-traditional, non-scriptural neo-gurus and neo-saints, who gained popularity by preaching against material pursuits. They spread messages like, "Money won’t buy happiness," or "Wealth won’t get you to heaven." How convenient! If I were a wealthy man with vast riches, I, too, would promote such preachers to discourage competition. I would keep telling people, "Money isn’t everything," to pacify those who lack it.

Imagine if everyone realized that wealth does buy happiness, health, and power—the rich would face fierce competition, and their monopoly would crumble.

 

The Ongoing Psychological Warfare

Hindus are still told to renounce power while others accumulate it. They’re praised for "peacefulness," a hollow virtue in a material world. Politicians posing as Hindus preach surrender—abandon Shakti, Laxmi, and Saraswati—leaving Hindus weak but deluded into feeling "superior."

The cycle continues. Any society which has an imbalance in these 3 powers, will perish from a society which has a balanced view of these powers. This is why less thatn 1% of the people of any nation, country, society were able to colonise, conquer the rest.

 

Sovil engineering: Dismissing the superiority by infecting their legacy

 It is often said that pyramids were built by slaves or aliens. why? Because it is hard to digest for the current superior feeling supremacists to admit that the ancients were wiser than us & for some reason they didnt consider the future generation worthy of this knowledge. What about the kylasha temple or Angkor wat then? Hindus didnt have slavery!; their answer is it must be aliens. How can the brown bastards build something impossible to even whites by modern standards without the modern technology?.

Ancient builders built pyramids, kylasa temple, angkor wat which today we cannot build even with modern technology. They were humans. This was possible because generations were allowed, encouraged to pursue one speciality, one expertise in one field. They were identified with that expertise. A generation of carpenters had a suffix of carpenter to their name, which later became their surname, many left that profession, joined other profession chasing money, wealth but retained that suffix.

Does the disbelief meter goes up as the melanin in the skin goes up and comes down as the skin becomes whiter? Seems like it, since almost all those pushing such theories of aliens built it, slaves built it are mostly whites. These whites arent necessarily consious racists, may be sub concisously a bit supremacist, may be.

If we even try to justify it as a product of slavery then it means that slavery is more efficient & productive than capitalism & labor, which isn't true since post slavery progress in terms of science, technology has been way faster, stronger than pre slavery or at the times of slavery. It is pushing the narrative that we should bring back slavery to achieve great things as a civilization. We didn't bother to consider that these builders did it for something else, their goal of building these things was way different, what they were chasing was way different. These goals beyond of our basic needs of health, wealth, hunger, lust, love only come in a society where nobody is worried about whether they will be fed or not, whethey they will be able to afford their treatment or not, whether they will be taken care of in their oldern age or not?! These extra ordinary goals of individuals and as a group can only happen in a society where these needs arent a thing to worry about. The basic societal common programs have taken care of all the needs of an individual from birth to death including his food, health and leisure. Why are some in some part of the world are thinking about multiple genders, humans trying to act like animals or pets? because their basic needs are met, they aren't worried much about what would happen tomorrow or after a year. Prosperity came early but they do not now have to struggle or fight for existence, so now the human nature has found new struggles and problems to solve. So, it is necessary for the leadership to decide future goals, struggles for the soceity than letting the individuals find their individual struggle. If they do, then we might run into a problem of losing out on the vast varities of struggles or problems that vast number of people can come up with. In the absence of generational struggles or fight or problems to solve, it seems only right to have generational and societal goals too like building a pyramid, Angkor wat or going to mars. Let people have individual goals too. Unless we can replicate, duplicate what our ancestors have built and do a better version of it, we are all inferior. We havent progressed, we have regressed.

Sovil Engineering

 A series I am planning to write about social+evil engineering to make people choose what they want because some group feels that they know it better and they want to make people see it their way. Aguide to sociopaths and those who want to counter them. A way to make people have the maya of freedom but by the utilizing the human natures like choosing the best which eventually leads to choosing the least worst which leads them to control your options.

1. https://rockmine.blogspot.com/2025/03/sovil-engineerign-dismissing.html
2. https://rockmine.blogspot.com/2025/03/sovil-engineering-disarming-opponents.html
3. https://rockmine.blogspot.com/2025/03/sovil-engineering-make-them-choose-your.html
4. https://rockmine.blogspot.com/2025/03/fooling-world-with-narrative.html
5. https://rockmine.blogspot.com/2025/03/define-their-values-threaten-it-and.html

I would If I could 24: 3x employment at no extra cost, making everything (almost) paperless for citizens.

 problem: Whenever someone moves, especially those who rent, they have to get their address updated at too many places

1. All bank accounts
2. all credit cards
3. driving license
4. aadhar card
5. passport
6. gas connection
7. phone connection
8. broadband connection

and many more other things. All these require a person to keep traveling to various govt and public offices several times.

Solution: 

1. Give authority to police to provide a verified address to someone who either moves, relocates anywhere permanently or temporarily. 

2. Citizen then provides a list of places where he needs his address updated.

3. Police will then have an online way to intimate the all the sources like banks, passport office etc., to update the address.

4. citizen will then be charged a small fee per instance of this update of address at various places.

Advantages:

1. Increases engagement of police and citizens
2. Decreases the burden of paperwork, transit on citizens who have to move often 
3. Drastically reduces fraudulant documents
4. Increases employment (which is the lowest amongst any other country)